Pilonidal Cyst Excision: Primary Midline Closure with versus without Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Pilonidal cysts are a painful condition that primarily affect young adult men. In the literature, numerous operative techniques for resolving pilonidal cysts are described, with variable outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare primarily closed midline incisions managed with or without the use of closed incision negative pressure therapy after pilonidal cyst excision. METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent excision and midline primary closure. Postoperative care composed of closed incisional negative pressure therapy (study group; n = 10) or gauze dressings (control group; n = 11). In both groups, the sutures were partially removed on day 14 and completely removed on day 21. Compared outcomes included the duration of hospitalization, pain on the day of surgical procedure, and on postoperative day 7, and time-to-healing. RESULTS: The median hospital stay was about 9 hours and 23 hours in the study and control groups, respectively (P < 0.05). The median pain scores on the day of operation were 1.20/10 in the study group and 3.36/10 in the control group (P < 0.05). On day 7, study group showed median pain score 0.9/10 and control group showed 2.63/10 (P < 0.05). The mean healing time was 23.8 and 57.9 days in the ciNPT group and gauze group, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These outcomes supported the incorporation of closed incision negative pressure therapy into our surgical treatment protocol for pilonidal cysts.

Accuracy of the ultrasound examination in patients with inguinal hernia. / Avaliação da acurácia do exame ultrassonográfico em pacientes portadores de hérnia inguinal.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of inguinal hernia in the preoperative period of patients submitted to inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHODS: we conducted a retrospective, descriptive, analytical study, based on data obtained from the charts of patients submitted to inguinal herniorrhaphy between January 2016 and December 2017 and who underwent ultrasonography in the preoperative period. The sample consisted of 232 patients, and we compared the results of the ultrasonography with the complaints, physical examination and intraoperative findings. RESULTS: ultrasonography was in agreement with inguinal hernia complaint in 52% of patients (p=0.019). There was a disagreement between the percentage of patients who presented a hernia at the physical examination not confirmed by the ultrasound examination (28.57%) and the percentage of hernias identified only by the complementary examination (8.93%), with statistical significance (p=0.0291). When comparing the ultrasound findings with the intraoperative ones, 32.70% of patients presenting with hernia had normal ultrasonography, with statistical significance for discordance (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: ultrasound was an unreliable method to help diagnosis in dubious cases of inguinal hernia, and dispensable when the diagnosis was confirmed by typical complaints and compatible physical examination.

OBJETIVO: avaliar a acurácia da ultrassonografia no diagnóstico de hérnia inguinal no pré-operatório de pacientes submetidos à herniorrafia inguinal. MÉTODOS: estudo retrospectivo descritivo, analítico, baseado em dados obtidos dos prontuários de pacientes submetidos à herniorrafia inguinal entre janeiro de 2016 e dezembro de 2017 e que realizaram ultrassonografia no período pré-operatório. A amostra foi composta por 232 pacientes e foram comparados os resultados da ultrassonografia com as queixas, exame físico e achados intraoperatórios desses pacientes. RESULTADOS: a ultrassonografia apresentou concordância com a queixa de hérnia inguinal em 52% dos pacientes (p=0,019). Houve discordância entre a porcentagem de pacientes que apresentaram hérnia ao exame físico não confirmada pelo exame ultrassonográfico (28,57%) e a porcentagem de hérnias identificadas somente ao exame complementar (8,93%), com significância estatística (p=0,0291). Quando comparados os resultados ultrassonográficos com achados intraoperatórios, 32,70% dos pacientes que apresentavam hérnia tinham ultrassonografia normal com significância estatística para discordância (p=0,001). CONCLUSÃO: a ultrassonografia mostrou-se método não confiável para auxiliar no diagnóstico em casos duvidosos de hérnia inguinal e dispensável quando o diagnóstico era confirmado por queixas típicas e exame físico compatível.

Avaliação da acurácia do exame ultrassonográfico em pacientes portadores de hérnia inguinal / Accuracy of the ultrasound examination in patients with inguinal hernia

RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a acurácia da ultrassonografia no diagnóstico de hérnia inguinal no pré-operatório de pacientes submetidos à herniorrafia inguinal. Métodos: estudo retrospectivo descritivo, analítico, baseado em dados obtidos dos prontuários de pacientes submetidos à herniorrafia inguinal entre janeiro de 2016 e dezembro de 2017 e que realizaram ultrassonografia no período pré-operatório. A amostra foi composta por 232 pacientes e foram comparados os resultados da ultrassonografia com as queixas, exame físico e achados intraoperatórios desses pacientes. Resultados: a ultrassonografia apresentou concordância com a queixa de hérnia inguinal em 52% dos pacientes (p=0,019). Houve discordância entre a porcentagem de pacientes que apresentaram hérnia ao exame físico não confirmada pelo exame ultrassonográfico (28,57%) e a porcentagem de hérnias identificadas somente ao exame complementar (8,93%), com significância estatística (p=0,0291). Quando comparados os resultados ultrassonográficos com achados intraoperatórios, 32,70% dos pacientes que apresentavam hérnia tinham ultrassonografia normal com significância estatística para discordância (p=0,001). Conclusão: a ultrassonografia mostrou-se método não confiável para auxiliar no diagnóstico em casos duvidosos de hérnia inguinal e dispensável quando o diagnóstico era confirmado por queixas típicas e exame físico compatível.

ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of inguinal hernia in the preoperative period of patients submitted to inguinal herniorrhaphy. Methods: we conducted a retrospective, descriptive, analytical study, based on data obtained from the charts of patients submitted to inguinal herniorrhaphy between January 2016 and December 2017 and who underwent ultrasonography in the preoperative period. The sample consisted of 232 patients, and we compared the results of the ultrasonography with the complaints, physical examination and intraoperative findings. Results: ultrasonography was in agreement with inguinal hernia complaint in 52% of patients (p=0.019). There was a disagreement between the percentage of patients who presented a hernia at the physical examination not confirmed by the ultrasound examination (28.57%) and the percentage of hernias identified only by the complementary examination (8.93%), with statistical significance (p=0.0291). When comparing the ultrasound findings with the intraoperative ones, 32.70% of patients presenting with hernia had normal ultrasonography, with statistical significance for discordance (p=0.001). Conclusion: ultrasound was an unreliable method to help diagnosis in dubious cases of inguinal hernia, and dispensable when the diagnosis was confirmed by typical complaints and compatible physical examination.

Cardiomiopatia hipertrófica e gravidez / Hypertrophic cardiomyophaty and pregnancy

A cardiomiopatia hipertrófica (CMH) é doença incomum na gestação, caracterizada pela hipertrofia do ventrículo esquerdo, com expressão fenotípica e manifestações clínicas variáveis. O diagnóstico pode ser confirmado pelo ecocardiograma com Doppler. Trata-se de enfermidade bem tolerada na gestação, entretanto, pode desencadear insuficiência cardíaca congestiva, com grave comprometimento materno e perinatal. O tratamento para a gestante com CMH depende da obstrução do fluxo do ventrículo esquerdo. Em paciente sintomática portadora da forma obstrutiva, devem-se evitar grandes perdas sanguíneas e uso de drogas vasodilatadoras durante o trabalho de parto. O parto vaginal mostrou-se seguro, mas o período expulsivo deve ser abreviado com uso de fórceps naquelas que apresentam sintomatologia obstrutiva. Raras complicações podem acontecer, o que requer planejamento do parto e adequada monitorização materna e fetal. (AU)

The Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an uncommon condition during pregnancy, which attends with a left ventricular hypertrophy, and phenotypic expression and clinical are both variable. The diagnosis can be confirmed by Doppler echocardiography. Several studies show that it is a disease well tolerate during pregnancy, however it may trigger congestive heart failure with severe maternal and perinatal commitment. The treatment of pregnant patients with HCM depends on the presence of symptoms caused by obstruction of the left ventricle. In symptomatic patient carrying the obstructive form should be avoided large blood loss and use of vasodilator drugs during labor. Vaginal delivery is safe, but the expulsive period should be abbreviated with the use of forceps in those with obstructive symptoms. Rare complications can occur and therefore it is necessary a delivery planning and an adequate maternal and fetal monitoring. (AU)